Touchline Signal — Soccer scouting research
Share your expertise
Video and podcast roundups

How should a club turn viewing into a same-shortlist supplier trial?

Touchline Signal research deskSection 07Page 8 of 10Last updated 3 Nov 2026
Adult writing notes beside a laptop and smartphone on a wooden table outdoors.

Use the media to formulate tests, not to award purchasing scores. The following is this desk’s proposed worksheet, rather than a methodology claimed by any individual speaker.

Trial field What to record
Recruitment decision The role, squad need, competition-season scope and deadline
Existing-stack baseline What the club can already establish, including current workarounds
Supplier contribution Additional supported findings, separately from reformatted existing findings
Evidence trail Match, player identifier, timestamp, field definition and source where applicable
Coverage exceptions Missing matches, seasons, footage or required fields
Integration work Matching failures, manual steps, engineering dependencies and correction time
Intended use Written clarification for exports, storage, modelling, AI processing and group sharing
Decision Retain, add, replace, consolidate, investigate further or buy nothing

What should the evaluation team do differently after watching?

  • Head of scouting: Specify observable football behaviours before selecting metrics.
  • Recruitment analytics lead: Reproduce one relevant result using an authorised sample; document exceptions rather than hiding them in an average score.
  • NWSL recruitment lead: Test women’s competitions and comparison populations directly.
  • Sporting director or general manager: Ask what decision changes, what work remains and who owns implementation.
  • Group procurement lead: Request entity-specific scope and written answers on intended workflows before assuming a group-wide solution.

For AI-assisted reports, include deliberate factual verification. NIST’s Generative AI Profile identifies confidently presented false content—and even fabricated supporting logic or citations—as a recognised risk. That is a reason to test evidence tracing, not a finding that any supplier in this roundup has failed. NIST Generative AI Profile. (nvlpubs.nist.gov)

Sources cited on this page

  1. NIST Generative AI Profilenvlpubs.nist.gov
  2. nvlpubs.nist.govnvlpubs.nist.gov
Download research