Touchline Signal — Soccer scouting research
Share your expertise
Section 10 of 12 / Learn from the field

Newsletter editions

Bring weekly, monthly and quarterly developments into your decision meeting.

21Pages
41Sources cited
3 Nov 2026Last updated
A soccer training pitch illuminated at dusk

A briefing for the decision meeting.

Weekly BriefingSample edition

Before you buy more scouting data, check what changed on 29 October

Statsbomb adds player identification; NWSL season-end creates a coverage checkpoint; Ukraine coverage needs a contract-level check.

28 October–3 November 2026 Read the sample edition →
Monthly DigestSample edition

October scouting intelligence: women’s benchmarks, Swedish rights and the integration owner

Four signals to turn into supplier acceptance tests—not another “best scouting software” ranking.

October 2026 · Last updated 3 November 2026 Read the sample edition →
Quarterly OutlookSample edition

Q1 2027 scouting outlook: buy the missing evidence, not another interface

Prepare for the MLS Sprint Season, challenge subscription overlap and make AI permissions explicit.

Read the sample edition →

In this section

01

What should recruitment buyers do this week?

Refresh the existing-stack baseline before approving another supplier trial.

Read →
02

What should go into the weekly decision meeting?

Bring a one-page change log, not another product demonstration.

Read →
03

What is the next calendar checkpoint?

MLS Decision Day is scheduled for 7 November 2026.

Read →
05

What should October’s developments change in your buying process?

Ask more precise questions about role fit, women’s data and operational ownership.

Read →
06

1. What does San Diego Wave’s framework-first approach imply for supplier trials?

5 October · Supplier-hosted practitioner interview.

Read →
07

2. What should NWSL buyers ask about women-specific physical metrics?

21 October · Supplier webinar publication.

Read →
08

3. Does Sweden’s rights renewal prove women’s league coverage?

23 October · Supplier rights announcement.

Read →
09

4. Who should own the integration after procurement signs?

Hiring signal · Reviewed 3 November.

Read →
10

What should your women’s coverage comparison contain?

Use the following as a request template, not a claim of supplier availability.

Read →
11

What can you test without commissioning a full procurement project?

Start with one historical dataset and one live coverage request.

Read →
13

What is the desk’s purchasing stance for Q1?

Re-test what you already license, then fund the smallest addition that closes a verified recruitment gap.

Read →
14

1. What does the 2027 MLS calendar change require from suppliers?

Confirmed calendar; purchasing implications are ours.

Read →
15

2. Is an integrated video-and-data product now a credible replacement?

22 July 2026 · Supplier launch.

Read →
16

3. Are apparently separate suppliers using overlapping inputs?

2 July 2026 · Supplier partnership.

Read →
17

4. What should an AI scouting assistant have to prove?

3 August 2026 · Supplier launch.

Read →
18

5. Which integration and licence questions belong before signature?

First, check included integration services.

Read →
19

What should be completed before Q1—and during it?

Use this proposed sequence, adjusting it to your actual renewal and recruitment deadlines.

Read →
20

Which outcomes should remain open?

Quarterly action: Put one unresolved recruitment question, one named budget owner and one decision date on the first page of every supplier evaluation.

Read →
Sources

Subject: October scouting intelligence: women’s benchmarks, Swedish rights and the integration owner

Read →
Sources

Subject: October scouting intelligence: women’s benchmarks, Swedish rights and the integration owner

Read →
Sources

Subject: October scouting intelligence: women’s benchmarks, Swedish rights and the integration owner

Read →