
Potentially, but the connection must be established rather than inferred from the nationality of a player or supplier. Article 2 covers, among other situations, EU-established deployers and third-country providers or deployers where system outputs are used in the EU. That makes shared recruitment models within an ownership group a specific review priority. (ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu)
Annex III lists AI intended for recruitment or selection, candidate evaluation, certain work-related decisions and worker-performance monitoring. A supplier’s precise intended purpose matters: do not classify every statistical database or video search engine identically. (ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu)
The 27 July 2026 AI Omnibus moved the Annex III high-risk application date to 2 December 2027. It is an enacted change, not merely the earlier proposal. The AI Act also expressly preserves the application of relevant EU data-protection legislation. (digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu)
Recommended multi-club licence stress test:
- Identify every entity using the system and every country in which outputs inform decisions.
- Separate supplier, integrator and club responsibilities.
- Obtain the supplier’s intended-use and classification rationale.
- Require model-version records, change notices and access to relevant documentation.
- Review permission to share underlying data, inferred scores and reports separately.
An enterprise account is not an adequate substitute for this entity-and-workflow map.
Sources cited on this page
- ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.euai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu
- ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.euai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu
- digital-strategy.ec.europa.eudigital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
